I just found out that there is a Dominican named Jacques Arnould. It is also an opponent of créationnnisme.
It is also incumbent theology and history of science. I wonder if it is as close to a Marc Arnould, psychoanalyst or something like that.
Before answering the question he had as his book on the debate with a creationist creationists American, I will first say a few things on the non-theological study.
History of Science Discipline is the worst possible to learn the history of science. It is hardly historic, and certainly not scientific. If you look at science as a town or a quite monolithic type Persian monarchy, History of Science is the national epic Schahnahme and Historians of Science's Ferdaus. Ever the historian of science, in a conflict between a position analogous to that of modern science and another is missing an opportunity to support the position analogous to that she was weak arguments as precursory of Light and repel other position as an error depui fortunately defeated. Giordano Bruno is listed as a hero, John Kepler is a position greater than his master Tychon Brahe, Popes Urban VIII and Pius IX condemned or supported scientific opponents of Galileo and Charles Darwin as there are villains. If this is not true for everyone, this is the general trend.
Mathematics has a somewhat special. On the one hand it is assumed that the definitions of the ancient Greeks were right, but the other one holds the Chifre also known as zero, it supports the writing of a somewhat abbreviated form what
"(ab) 2 = a 2-2ab + b 2 "
as proof that a product and thereby also a result and thus also a number can be negative. French textbooks have the great advantage to those of Sweden to present it as "integers" and at the same time wrong (mathematically exact terminology) not to prefer the reverse name "Relations numerals. Among those students who have thus include a great example of the stylistic figure metonymy.
But back to Jacques Arnould OP
The U.S. had asked creationist "who created Paris?" Dominican and started to stammer something about the various men who have been involved, without being sure who should be summoned before the others, then the creationist said "no, it is God who created Paris."
Jacques Arnould OP has found it hard. He found evidence that creationists are men doctrinaire unimaginative or even realism. I have not personally met this American man, I can not dogmatic that he had not personally ç trait of characters, but I doubt it, because the example shows us that the Dominican Republic in this book (I just opened the book to read this dialogue) does not prove it. Instead, it proves that the American creationist s'avait asked the right questions about the essence of Paris.
Paris is first place on earth. 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East of Greenwich (ie 0 ° 0 '0 "East / West Eye Burst of Sainte Genevieve, as noted by an old issue of Journal of Courtly France). It was created like any other place on earth - by God.
This normally called Paris, is a part of the surface tellurian. All of which is below to the Center of the Earth (as we have until other geocentric center of the universe) to rock, sediments, tectonic plates (now, this is theoretical) and all this which is below the potential tectonic plates: it is God who created it, without exception. If Hell is there, like every other city below or non-urban location, as I believe, the only thing God did not create in it is the unwillingness of the damned.
All what is above, to Heaven, to the extreme outer limit of the universe (provided we have the geocentric reason), God created everything there too. The goodwill is more blessed than the poor of the Damned something that can be attributed to God.
Closer Look this surface tellurian 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East of Greenwich, c to d of Paris. The Seine runs there, God created the water and everything that is natural in the hollow where it flows, including Île de la Cité and Ile St Louis. But we can add somewhere that men have contributed to the banks of the Seine more stabile, less flooding, less vulnerable location by flooding there a.
The men also brought materials from elsewhere to build houses and churches and other buildings and monuments. We can say that only existed in Paris before power that men come to live. Location 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East Greenwich does not become really Paris before that. Even more: it is Paris after Lutetia Parisiorum. Maybe after something else before. So anyway, as is Jacques Arnould man who created Paris?
But it is God who created man, God created every rock outside Paris which has been drawn marble is God who created the other rock, which was drawn lime to the concrete, and yet you put the pebbles in the concrete. It strengthens the concrete with steel skeletons, which is created in the steel its original materials, iron and coal? Again: God.
They sell crepes, indeed a human creation, but from eggs God let it happen in the chickens, milk that God reveals in the cows, wheat or sarrassine God has grown. Men have only planted the sarrassine or wheat, kept chickens and cows in captivity.
They sell wool sweaters *, but it is God who created the sheep. And the knitters and knitters. If the books are done on linen paper, it is God who has grown flax (yet planted first by a man) and industrial paper if it is God who created each tree.
It carries a lot of these things (sweaters more often than pancakes, as a proportion of total consumption of things) in railway trains or cars, and that created the electricity (it is explained by real electrons and electromagnetic power - no one has seen neither the one nor the other, except, s' they are perhaps the angels and God - or otherwise), who created the tar, who created the oil? God.
When we say that God is almighty means that God does every thing that happens, we entand that everything that happens is done either by the choice of God or by his permission. And likewise, when we say that God is the Creator of all things visible and invisible means that there are things that God created directly, there are other which have been rearranged by a creature before they are rearranged but also from the visible creature.
We see a parallel in the Church. And it's very dangerous for a clergyman to forget that angels, souls, bodies involved especially the Sacraments, the materials which made the sacraments and sacramental, places where the Church takes place, all that is creature of God. A bishop may choose such a city rather than another to make his mission, and when the choice is not hers, is that of another man, a pope or patriarch that sends a king or who advertising (would not that nice if the King of Morocco claimed the monks Barroux to his baptism and a Catholic mission? - except that there is not, it is still a Muslim). The written law in Sweden's oldest home, the Westrogothe Act (which is not the Law Visigoth) begins with a chapter called the Church, which is set when a child is baptized and who is allowed to go at the Bishop's claim for a new parish priest. But every choice made by a man does have other than what God Himself has created or given.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
Mouffetard, Paris V
Jan 29, 2011, the feast of
St. Francis de Sales
* If "chandala" then it is the fault of the librarian, I asked him the question.
It is also incumbent theology and history of science. I wonder if it is as close to a Marc Arnould, psychoanalyst or something like that.
Before answering the question he had as his book on the debate with a creationist creationists American, I will first say a few things on the non-theological study.
History of Science Discipline is the worst possible to learn the history of science. It is hardly historic, and certainly not scientific. If you look at science as a town or a quite monolithic type Persian monarchy, History of Science is the national epic Schahnahme and Historians of Science's Ferdaus. Ever the historian of science, in a conflict between a position analogous to that of modern science and another is missing an opportunity to support the position analogous to that she was weak arguments as precursory of Light and repel other position as an error depui fortunately defeated. Giordano Bruno is listed as a hero, John Kepler is a position greater than his master Tychon Brahe, Popes Urban VIII and Pius IX condemned or supported scientific opponents of Galileo and Charles Darwin as there are villains. If this is not true for everyone, this is the general trend.
Mathematics has a somewhat special. On the one hand it is assumed that the definitions of the ancient Greeks were right, but the other one holds the Chifre also known as zero, it supports the writing of a somewhat abbreviated form what
as proof that a product and thereby also a result and thus also a number can be negative. French textbooks have the great advantage to those of Sweden to present it as "integers" and at the same time wrong (mathematically exact terminology) not to prefer the reverse name "Relations numerals. Among those students who have thus include a great example of the stylistic figure metonymy.
But back to Jacques Arnould OP
The U.S. had asked creationist "who created Paris?" Dominican and started to stammer something about the various men who have been involved, without being sure who should be summoned before the others, then the creationist said "no, it is God who created Paris."
Jacques Arnould OP has found it hard. He found evidence that creationists are men doctrinaire unimaginative or even realism. I have not personally met this American man, I can not dogmatic that he had not personally ç trait of characters, but I doubt it, because the example shows us that the Dominican Republic in this book (I just opened the book to read this dialogue) does not prove it. Instead, it proves that the American creationist s'avait asked the right questions about the essence of Paris.
Paris is first place on earth. 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East of Greenwich (ie 0 ° 0 '0 "East / West Eye Burst of Sainte Genevieve, as noted by an old issue of Journal of Courtly France). It was created like any other place on earth - by God.
This normally called Paris, is a part of the surface tellurian. All of which is below to the Center of the Earth (as we have until other geocentric center of the universe) to rock, sediments, tectonic plates (now, this is theoretical) and all this which is below the potential tectonic plates: it is God who created it, without exception. If Hell is there, like every other city below or non-urban location, as I believe, the only thing God did not create in it is the unwillingness of the damned.
All what is above, to Heaven, to the extreme outer limit of the universe (provided we have the geocentric reason), God created everything there too. The goodwill is more blessed than the poor of the Damned something that can be attributed to God.
Closer Look this surface tellurian 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East of Greenwich, c to d of Paris. The Seine runs there, God created the water and everything that is natural in the hollow where it flows, including Île de la Cité and Ile St Louis. But we can add somewhere that men have contributed to the banks of the Seine more stabile, less flooding, less vulnerable location by flooding there a.
The men also brought materials from elsewhere to build houses and churches and other buildings and monuments. We can say that only existed in Paris before power that men come to live. Location 48 ° 51 '24 "North of the Equator and 2 ° 21' 07" East Greenwich does not become really Paris before that. Even more: it is Paris after Lutetia Parisiorum. Maybe after something else before. So anyway, as is Jacques Arnould man who created Paris?
But it is God who created man, God created every rock outside Paris which has been drawn marble is God who created the other rock, which was drawn lime to the concrete, and yet you put the pebbles in the concrete. It strengthens the concrete with steel skeletons, which is created in the steel its original materials, iron and coal? Again: God.
They sell crepes, indeed a human creation, but from eggs God let it happen in the chickens, milk that God reveals in the cows, wheat or sarrassine God has grown. Men have only planted the sarrassine or wheat, kept chickens and cows in captivity.
They sell wool sweaters *, but it is God who created the sheep. And the knitters and knitters. If the books are done on linen paper, it is God who has grown flax (yet planted first by a man) and industrial paper if it is God who created each tree.
It carries a lot of these things (sweaters more often than pancakes, as a proportion of total consumption of things) in railway trains or cars, and that created the electricity (it is explained by real electrons and electromagnetic power - no one has seen neither the one nor the other, except, s' they are perhaps the angels and God - or otherwise), who created the tar, who created the oil? God.
When we say that God is almighty means that God does every thing that happens, we entand that everything that happens is done either by the choice of God or by his permission. And likewise, when we say that God is the Creator of all things visible and invisible means that there are things that God created directly, there are other which have been rearranged by a creature before they are rearranged but also from the visible creature.
We see a parallel in the Church. And it's very dangerous for a clergyman to forget that angels, souls, bodies involved especially the Sacraments, the materials which made the sacraments and sacramental, places where the Church takes place, all that is creature of God. A bishop may choose such a city rather than another to make his mission, and when the choice is not hers, is that of another man, a pope or patriarch that sends a king or who advertising (would not that nice if the King of Morocco claimed the monks Barroux to his baptism and a Catholic mission? - except that there is not, it is still a Muslim). The written law in Sweden's oldest home, the Westrogothe Act (which is not the Law Visigoth) begins with a chapter called the Church, which is set when a child is baptized and who is allowed to go at the Bishop's claim for a new parish priest. But every choice made by a man does have other than what God Himself has created or given.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
Mouffetard, Paris V
Jan 29, 2011, the feast of
St. Francis de Sales
* If "chandala" then it is the fault of the librarian, I asked him the question.
0 comments:
Post a Comment