Before moralize, you better know what we are talking about.
In English, the word "Racist" was spotted by scholars Oxford Dictionary Français the first time in 1932, the page being torn da BPI I rebuilt since information on Facebook in an article on the Slavophile or Slavophils by Trotsky, translated into English by someone less interesting, which was actually quoted, but I do not remember. The word "Racism" I have not checked.
The word "Racialist" is older English, already a debate in Canada in 1917. Twenty years later it will be applied to the followers of Mein Kampf or Mythus des XX Jahrhunderts Germany. Trotsky did not invent the word, he just contributed through his translator, back on the French model.
In 1932, then go back to 1929, in French, the OED Robert
Is this really how we use the word today? That's about the same censure, but not exactly the same criteria apply to someone. There are Muslims who would say all this on someone who does not have in his company, his show, his love, perhaps, for the poor, but excluding a place that is effective n ' also not a slave status. If that can not be racist grocer prefer hiring his cousin, is already there an apparent willingness to dominate the French? Le Pen himself 1 would not say it, and it's still him that they cite most often about the "racism" in France today. If a contractor may prefer his cousin, then the other may prefer his compatriot strain. One like the other is not racism in this sense, but preferably for others before others.
Even more: according to this definition, is THIS the writers are liars, I do not think either there are people who are not French native who meet best one or the other definition of racist given here by the sociologist. 2
But perhaps qualify as something akin to racism right now is still a French tradition? Even Robert
It is, indeed, that the journal article and can be accessed by Wikiquote. Robert does not mention, but one side is the author of evil people in the French action not to read Karl Marx, he boasts of realism criticizes the racist-for-so-mean 4 d have your head in the clouds and said that even their leader Mistral not following his disciples ... In Maurras
the word race is not to study science or biological raciology (Rassentypus German) but any one else, who claimed instead to be brought by family tradition, family heredity. Maurras speaks, indeed, Capetian as "the Third Race" - after the Merovingians and Carlovingians, of course. In this sense, but not in the sense of race science, Black Caribbean or Cameroon are closer to us than the Arabs and Roma darkest closest to us that the Afghans-Pashtuns. Because they shared the same religion longer, extendument, with more marriages between the groups. But of course the Manouche of France or Spain-France-Germany are closer to us than are from Rumania and closer to them than we are. We? Well, here it is anyway the Normans who share my race EX-Viking. And there were missionaries in France (Corbey) that we have saved the Viking lifestyle. St Anchaire and Rimbert alone, mostly.
It has nothing to do with the word "racialism" which depicts the turmoil of Margaret Sanger eugenics. It's the fault of an Adolf having mixed the two.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
BPI, G. Pompidou / Paris
4-II-2011
1 I said I do not like Le Pen, but that's another story: his attitude toward the adolescent is not as Bigoudin copy, and I prefer Gollnisch. --- 2 Provided that the example of the "chosen people" was really just part of his "racist" and not even a step further. Then there are a few that meet the definition of racist, others who fit the description of chosen people syndrome --- 3 I was wondering if (sic) was the word traditionalism or both n . Since he wrote nationalism with an n (without Robert sic), I think he vaccillé between paradigms "-tion-tional,-tionnalisme" ( as "traditional" ) and "-ing,-tionel?,-ism" ( as "na-" ). --- 4 A man who speaks of "racism" normally speaks no "supporters of racism" or "advocating racism" but "racist" - or he did not speak at all, he calls them "nationalists" (sic) analysis, but their "nationalism" (re-sic) as part of "racism and traditionalism." Although Robert did not find the name racist in his article in 1902.
In English, the word "Racist" was spotted by scholars Oxford Dictionary Français the first time in 1932, the page being torn da BPI I rebuilt since information on Facebook in an article on the Slavophile or Slavophils by Trotsky, translated into English by someone less interesting, which was actually quoted, but I do not remember. The word "Racism" I have not checked.
The word "Racialist" is older English, already a debate in Canada in 1917. Twenty years later it will be applied to the followers of Mein Kampf or Mythus des XX Jahrhunderts Germany. Trotsky did not invent the word, he just contributed through his translator, back on the French model.
In 1932, then go back to 1929, in French, the OED Robert
Racist. 1929
By adopting a racist ideology, these nations come to believe that their position is not prominent due to the merits to be nurtured, but only in favor of fate, their physical beauty (...) prominent groups who feel it may not become a hateful and demanding attitude vis-à-vis others. They believe that everything is owed to them since they are the "supreme race" (...) only the chosen people have rights on all (...) things for him there is no foreign nations, there are only slaves revolted (...)
Bouthoul Gaston, Treatise of Sociology, p. 273
Is this really how we use the word today? That's about the same censure, but not exactly the same criteria apply to someone. There are Muslims who would say all this on someone who does not have in his company, his show, his love, perhaps, for the poor, but excluding a place that is effective n ' also not a slave status. If that can not be racist grocer prefer hiring his cousin, is already there an apparent willingness to dominate the French? Le Pen himself 1 would not say it, and it's still him that they cite most often about the "racism" in France today. If a contractor may prefer his cousin, then the other may prefer his compatriot strain. One like the other is not racism in this sense, but preferably for others before others.
Even more: according to this definition, is THIS the writers are liars, I do not think either there are people who are not French native who meet best one or the other definition of racist given here by the sociologist. 2
But perhaps qualify as something akin to racism right now is still a French tradition? Even Robert
Racism. 1902
Are the writers of the French Action , jealous of their miserable doctrine philosophically based purely political, not watching the ideas of race and tradition as the bedrock nationalism and monarchy? (...) It is not for me to repeat here the trial of racism and traditionalism (sic 3).
A. Maybon, in Revue Blanche, No. 223, September 15, 1902, p.146-148
It is, indeed, that the journal article and can be accessed by Wikiquote. Robert does not mention, but one side is the author of evil people in the French action not to read Karl Marx, he boasts of realism criticizes the racist-for-so-mean 4 d have your head in the clouds and said that even their leader Mistral not following his disciples ... In Maurras
the word race is not to study science or biological raciology (Rassentypus German) but any one else, who claimed instead to be brought by family tradition, family heredity. Maurras speaks, indeed, Capetian as "the Third Race" - after the Merovingians and Carlovingians, of course. In this sense, but not in the sense of race science, Black Caribbean or Cameroon are closer to us than the Arabs and Roma darkest closest to us that the Afghans-Pashtuns. Because they shared the same religion longer, extendument, with more marriages between the groups. But of course the Manouche of France or Spain-France-Germany are closer to us than are from Rumania and closer to them than we are. We? Well, here it is anyway the Normans who share my race EX-Viking. And there were missionaries in France (Corbey) that we have saved the Viking lifestyle. St Anchaire and Rimbert alone, mostly.
It has nothing to do with the word "racialism" which depicts the turmoil of Margaret Sanger eugenics. It's the fault of an Adolf having mixed the two.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
BPI, G. Pompidou / Paris
4-II-2011
1 I said I do not like Le Pen, but that's another story: his attitude toward the adolescent is not as Bigoudin copy, and I prefer Gollnisch. --- 2 Provided that the example of the "chosen people" was really just part of his "racist" and not even a step further. Then there are a few that meet the definition of racist, others who fit the description of chosen people syndrome --- 3 I was wondering if (sic) was the word traditionalism or both n . Since he wrote nationalism with an n (without Robert sic), I think he vaccillé between paradigms "-tion-tional,-tionnalisme" ( as "traditional" ) and "-ing,-tionel?,-ism" ( as "na-" ). --- 4 A man who speaks of "racism" normally speaks no "supporters of racism" or "advocating racism" but "racist" - or he did not speak at all, he calls them "nationalists" (sic) analysis, but their "nationalism" (re-sic) as part of "racism and traditionalism." Although Robert did not find the name racist in his article in 1902.
0 comments:
Post a Comment