Masons, can they spoil career for an anti-mason, for example?
A week ago I reread the article in Nouvel Observateur on Freemasonry. It is very clear that no mason has his career because of its masonry. I doubt, because if two candidates and if one is a Freemason is the other anti-mason ... you see?
Well, first recall some facts, why not the names and professions especially the Great Masters:
One can believe that the trades of gm are not representative for each box, but rather to Freemasonry overall:
The boxes do not always understand each other very well, especially with the GOdF GL. But they still have one thing in common: "common enemy what the National Front, no doubt with the fundamentalists as Gollnisch and Jean Madiran (which is not a member) and Holleindre (which does is no longer a member) first referred.
Some more quotes:
taste a little with each word
"Any mason at the time of his initiation ..." - my mother forbade me to join quelquonque secret society, she cited the example of Franco who banned the masonry. I had an "initiation" in the schoolhouse was housed without her informed, but I'm not brave, and I never would brave the forbidden me to initiate in the boxes. But it's nice to remember, as good things, baptism, marriage, entry into religious orders, as well as some bad ones, like the lodge, an established order specifies the decision or step at a specific time.
"... must provide a criminal record ..." that I did not. The day of St. Agatha in 1998 provided me with three properties:
"... and take the first degree - Apprentice, journeyman - in the eyes of two brothers supervisors. " - This course allows people to harass someone claiming to be overseers of the brothers an apprentice bricklayer. Especially if they are people who are really in a box. Especially if the victim can be marginalized in certain positions inconsistent with the box, as faithful of the SSPX.
Alain Bauer, a Freemason, police said something about the view that membership in the houses would guarantee career
is probably very true that membership in a particular box is a guarantee to a particular career. Still, divisions between masons are limited: we have a common enemy, the National Front. Belong to any lodge in a profession with three fraternal sympathies and report same to the right or nationnale Catholic confessional ... it would not spoil some careers?
Le Nouvel Observateur reported some details of the fraternal example being the "Freemason meetings between the same profession to discuss trade between people of good will (sic) [they] are watched through. The masters condemn them, but the brothers remain free to join. " One wonders how many clergy, not just liberal Protestant, but even with some claim to orthodoxy are with sibling to learn. One wonders how they are open to certain non-members (no, do not invite me!), As clergy, Rotarians, intellectuals, Rosicrucians.
Because ultimately, my situation seems - at least to my eyes, I am as you see no prejudice to the Freemason, rather cons - have been managed by Freemason through the clergy whom I entrusted myself spiritually. There were so many that go unsaid in a very little resemblance to the truth that I know myself, but also in a very Kantian moral sense, which I suspected to be present enough in the dressing room and in the fraternal . There were so many remarks with a targeted rather teaching vis-à-vis me. There were so many people who showed me some collusion that allowed me expect a change in the direction I wanted and then wanted to make discrete, so I was too spoiled.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
BPI-GP, Paris
Ste Apolline,
9 - II - 2011
* In 1962, Jean Madiran said that sometimes it is an honor to have been in prison. Cervantes and Malory écrivèrent in prison.
A week ago I reread the article in Nouvel Observateur on Freemasonry. It is very clear that no mason has his career because of its masonry. I doubt, because if two candidates and if one is a Freemason is the other anti-mason ... you see?
Well, first recall some facts, why not the names and professions especially the Great Masters:
| Lodge | Name Occupation | |
|---|---|---|
| French National Grand Lodge 44 000 Francis | Stifani Brothers | lawyer |
| Grand Lodge of France Alain-Noël | Dubart | surgeon |
| Grand Orient de France 50 000 Brothers | Guy Arcizet | retired physician member of the Socialist Party |
| French Federation of Human Right | Jacques Samouelian | psychiatrist |
| Grand Lodge of France Women | Denise Oberlin | engineer (sic) |
One can believe that the trades of gm are not representative for each box, but rather to Freemasonry overall:
- Lawyer < juristes > judges militiares, police, prison administration, guardians of minors and adults disabilities
- surgeon, doctor, psychiatrist < corps médical avec ... > dentists, psychiatrists, avortionnistes, contraceptive function of gynecology, Social Security Administration, including CMU
- engineer (it is not called when it's ingenious engineer or a woman?) < technologie > EdF, GdF-Suez, technical services such as computer computers in libraries or ...
- lack of the 5 grand masters, but still there: teachers, kindergarten to university, not to mention librarians
The boxes do not always understand each other very well, especially with the GOdF GL. But they still have one thing in common: "common enemy what the National Front, no doubt with the fundamentalists as Gollnisch and Jean Madiran (which is not a member) and Holleindre (which does is no longer a member) first referred.
Some more quotes:
Any mason at the time of its introduction must provide a criminal record and take the first degrees - apprentice, journeyman - in the eyes of two brothers supervisors.
taste a little with each word
"Any mason at the time of his initiation ..." - my mother forbade me to join quelquonque secret society, she cited the example of Franco who banned the masonry. I had an "initiation" in the schoolhouse was housed without her informed, but I'm not brave, and I never would brave the forbidden me to initiate in the boxes. But it's nice to remember, as good things, baptism, marriage, entry into religious orders, as well as some bad ones, like the lodge, an established order specifies the decision or step at a specific time.
"... must provide a criminal record ..." that I did not. The day of St. Agatha in 1998 provided me with three properties:
- I have no criminal record * and therefore can not become a Freemason,
- I showed some vehemence in my defense against the Psychiatry and aid police (remember, when the police serve justice or public order, not disorder to establish a private life, I respect and I respected at the time too),
- and I ' I still have not taken a human life or injuries so debilitating.
"... and take the first degree - Apprentice, journeyman - in the eyes of two brothers supervisors. " - This course allows people to harass someone claiming to be overseers of the brothers an apprentice bricklayer. Especially if they are people who are really in a box. Especially if the victim can be marginalized in certain positions inconsistent with the box, as faithful of the SSPX.
Alain Bauer, a Freemason, police said something about the view that membership in the houses would guarantee career
This view is wrong. Why do you want a police officer of the Grand Orient Mason, a member of a union of the left get along with a policeman GLNF brother, a union member the right? In the police, as elsewhere, the brothers are divided. There is not even a fraternal professional (sic) but three. And I was invited in three.
is probably very true that membership in a particular box is a guarantee to a particular career. Still, divisions between masons are limited: we have a common enemy, the National Front. Belong to any lodge in a profession with three fraternal sympathies and report same to the right or nationnale Catholic confessional ... it would not spoil some careers?
Le Nouvel Observateur reported some details of the fraternal example being the "Freemason meetings between the same profession to discuss trade between people of good will (sic) [they] are watched through. The masters condemn them, but the brothers remain free to join. " One wonders how many clergy, not just liberal Protestant, but even with some claim to orthodoxy are with sibling to learn. One wonders how they are open to certain non-members (no, do not invite me!), As clergy, Rotarians, intellectuals, Rosicrucians.
Because ultimately, my situation seems - at least to my eyes, I am as you see no prejudice to the Freemason, rather cons - have been managed by Freemason through the clergy whom I entrusted myself spiritually. There were so many that go unsaid in a very little resemblance to the truth that I know myself, but also in a very Kantian moral sense, which I suspected to be present enough in the dressing room and in the fraternal . There were so many remarks with a targeted rather teaching vis-à-vis me. There were so many people who showed me some collusion that allowed me expect a change in the direction I wanted and then wanted to make discrete, so I was too spoiled.
Hans-Georg Lundahl
BPI-GP, Paris
Ste Apolline,
9 - II - 2011
* In 1962, Jean Madiran said that sometimes it is an honor to have been in prison. Cervantes and Malory écrivèrent in prison.
0 comments:
Post a Comment